We recently completed our first Full Board Review using Cayuse. We had to send it back to the PI for further clarification/revisions. What is the workflow when it comes back from the PI with the revisions? It's still in the Full Board workflow, correct? Can all the IRB Committee Members still see the submission to look at the responses to their comments and close them out? Or does the submission need to be assigned to a Committee Meeting first?
We are in the same boat-but we are trying to return to return to PI before the meeting to make changes before we even meet and we can't figure out how to do it. I think that when you retrun to PI it will reopen for editing in the same full review workflow.
I think once you have assigned it to the FB Review, you cannot send it back to the PI for revisions prior to actually making a decision. Unless, you can change the review type or re-assign back to the analyst? We actually deferred our vote as we needed a lot of additional information. Once we made that decision within the FB Review it was returned to the PI and re-opened for the PI to address all the comments. It came back from the PI and I just moved it forward in the workflow. It is still as a FB review with all the reviewers able to see the submission.
Your analyst should be able to go into that study and have the ability to change review/type or reviewers or Return to Investigators. I have all Admin privileges and this what I see when I go into our one study that I just assigned to a FB meeting. Does this help?
Copyright © 2023 Cayuse. Site Design by eConverse Media.